Detailed Information

Cited 108 time in webofscience Cited 118 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery

Authors
Sng, Kevin KaityHara, MasayasuShin, Jae-WonYoo, Byung-EunYang, Kyung-SookKim, Seon-Hahn
Issue Date
Sep-2013
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Robot-assisted; Learning curve; Cumulative sum; Rectal cancer; Colorectal; Minimally invasive surgery
Citation
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, v.27, no.9, pp 3297 - 3307
Pages
11
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Volume
27
Number
9
Start Page
3297
End Page
3307
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/10375
DOI
10.1007/s00464-013-2909-4
ISSN
0930-2794
1432-2218
Abstract
Robotic rectal surgery is gaining in popularity. We aimed to define the learning curve of an experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeon in performing robot-assisted rectal surgery. We hypothesized that there are multiple phases in this learning process. We performed a retrospective analysis. Consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted rectal surgery between July 2007 and August 2011 were identified. Operating times were analyzed using the CUSUM (cumulative sum) technique. CUSUMs were model fitted as a fourth-order polynomial. chi(2), Fisher's exact, two independent samples t test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests were used. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We identified 197 patients. The median (range) total operative, robot, console, and docking times (min) were 265 (145-515), 140 (59-367), 135 (50-360), and 5 (3-40), respectively. CUSUM analysis of docking time showed a learning curve of 35 cases. CUSUM analysis of total operative, robot, and console times demonstrated three phases. The first phase (35 patients) represented the initial learning curve. The second phase (93 patients) involved more challenging cases with increased operative time. The third phase (69 patients) represented the concluding phase in the learning curve. There was increased complexity of cases in the latter two phases. Of phase 1 patients, 45.7 % had tumors a parts per thousand currency sign7 cm from the anal verge compared to 64.2 % in phases 2 and 3 (p = 0.042). Of phase 1 patients, 2.9 % had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to 32.7 % of patients in phases 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Splenic flexure was mobilized in 8.6 % of phase 1 patients compared to 56.8 % of patients in phases 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Median blood loss was < 50 ml in all three phases. The patients in phases 2 and 3 had a longer hospital stay compared to those in phase 1 (9 vs. 8 days, p = 0.002). There were no conversions. At least three phases in the learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery are defined in our study.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE