Detailed Information

Cited 77 time in webofscience Cited 80 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Vaccinia-based oncolytic immunotherapy Pexastimogene Devacirepvec in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib failure: a randomized multicenter Phase IIb trial (TRAVERSE)open access

Authors
Moehler, M.Heo, J.Lee, H. C.Tak, W. Y.Chao, Y.Paik, S. W.Yim, H. J.Byun, K. S.Baron, A.Ungerechts, G.Jonker, D.Ruo, L.Cho, M.Kaubisch, A.Wege, H.Merle, P.Ebert, O.Habersetzer, F.Blanc, J. F.Rosmorduc, OlivierLencioni, R.Patt, R.Leen, A. M.Foerster, F.Homerin, M.Stojkowitz, N.Lusky, M.Limacher, J. M.Hennequi, M.Gaspar, N.McFadden, B.De Silva, N.Shen, D.Pelusio, A.Kirn, D. H.Breitbach, C. J.Burke, J. M.
Issue Date
Aug-2019
Publisher
Landes Bioscience
Keywords
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Pexa-Vec; sorafenib; oncolytic immunotherapy; oncolytic vaccinia
Citation
OncoImmunology, v.8, no.8
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
OncoImmunology
Volume
8
Number
8
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/1736
DOI
10.1080/2162402X.2019.1615817
ISSN
2162-4011
2162-402X
Abstract
Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) is a vaccinia virus-based oncolytic immunotherapy designed to preferentially replicate in and destroy tumor cells while stimulating anti-tumor immunity by expressing GM-CSF. An earlier randomized Phase IIa trial in predominantly sorafenib-naive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit. This randomized, open-label Phase IIb trial investigated whether Pexa-Vec plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) improved OS over BSC alone in HCC patients who failed sorafenib therapy (TRAVERSE). 129 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone. Pexa-Vec was given as a single intravenous (IV) infusion followed by up to 5 IT injections. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and safety. A high drop-out rate in the control arm (63%) confounded assessment of response-based endpoints. Median OS (ITT) for Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone was 4.2 and 4.4 months, respectively (HR, 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78-1.80; p = .428). There was no difference between the two treatment arms in RR or TTP. Pexa-Vec was generally well-tolerated. The most frequent Grade 3 included pyrexia (8%) and hypotension (8%). Induction of immune responses to vaccinia antigens and HCC associated antigens were observed. Despite a tolerable safety profile and induction of T cell responses, Pexa-Vec did not improve OS as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure. The true potential of oncolytic viruses may lie in the treatment of patients with earlier disease stages which should be addressed in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01387555
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yim, Hyung Joon photo

Yim, Hyung Joon
Ansan Hospital (Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ansan Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE