Detailed Information

Cited 10 time in webofscience Cited 10 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Between Standard Versus Telephone-Basic Life Support Training Program in Middle-Aged and Elderly Housewives: A Randomized Simulation Study

Authors
Kim, Tae HanLee, Yu JinLee, Eui JungRo, Young SunLee, KyungWonLee, HyeonaJang, Dayea BeatriceSong, Kyoung JunShin, Sang DoMyklebust, HelgeBirkenes, Tonje Soraas
Issue Date
Feb-2018
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Keywords
Telephone CPR; Basic life support; Cardiac arrest
Citation
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, v.13, no.1, pp 27 - 32
Pages
6
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE
Volume
13
Number
1
Start Page
27
End Page
32
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/29062
DOI
10.1097/SIH.0000000000000286
ISSN
1559-2332
1559-713X
Abstract
Introduction For cardiac arrests witnessed at home, the witness is usually a middle-aged or older housewife. We compared the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance of bystanders trained with the newly developed telephone-basic life support (T-BLS) program and those trained with standard BLS (S-BLS) training programs. Methods Twenty-four middle-aged and older housewives without previous CPR education were enrolled and randomized into two groups of BLS training programs. The T-BLS training program included concepts and current instruction protocols for telephone-assisted CPR, whereas the S-BLS training program provided training for BLS. After each training course, the participants simulated CPR and were assisted by a dispatcher via telephone. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality was measured and recorded using a mannequin simulator. The primary outcome was total no-flow time (>1.5 seconds without chest compression) during simulation. Results Among 24 participants, two (8.3%) who experienced mechanical failure of simulation mannequin and one (4.2%) who violated simulation protocols were excluded at initial simulation, and two (8.3%) refused follow-up after 6 months. The median (interquartile range) total no-flow time during initial simulation was 79.6 (66.4-96.9) seconds for the T-BLS training group and 147.6 (122.5-184.0) seconds for the S-BLS training group (P < 0.01). Median cumulative interruption time and median number of interruption events during BLS at initial simulation and 6-month follow-up simulation were significantly shorter in the T-BLS than in the S-BLS group (1.0 vs. 9.5, P < 0.01, and 1.0 vs. 10.5, P = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions Participants trained with the T-BLS training program showed shorter no-flow time and fewer interruptions during bystander CPR simulation assisted by a dispatcher.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Emergency Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE