Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 8 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A randomized, multicenter, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polmacoxib compared with celecoxib and placebo for patients with osteoarthritis

Authors
Lee, MyungchulYoo, JuhyungKim, Jin GooKyung, Hee-SooBin, Seong-IlKang, Seung-BaikChoi, Choong HyeokMoon, Young-WanKim, Young-MoHan, Seung BeomIn, YongChoi, Chong HyukKim, JongohLee, Beom KooCho, Sangsook
Issue Date
Dec-2017
Publisher
대한정형외과학회
Keywords
Celecoxib; Cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor; Osteoarthritis; Placebo; Polmacoxib
Citation
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, v.9, no.4, pp 439 - 457
Pages
19
Indexed
SCOPUS
ESCI
KCI
Journal Title
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
Volume
9
Number
4
Start Page
439
End Page
457
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/29598
DOI
10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.439
ISSN
2005-291x
2005-4408
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and analgesic efficacy of polmacoxib 2 mg versus placebo in a superiority comparison or versus celecoxib 200 mg in a noninferiority comparison in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods This study was a 6-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, and parallel-group trial followed by an 18-week, single arm, open-label extension. Of the 441 patients with knee or hip OA screened, 362 were randomized; 324 completed 6 weeks of treatment and 220 completed the extension. Patients were randomized to receive oral polmacoxib 2 mg (n = 146), celecoxib 200 mg (n = 145), or placebo (n = 71) once daily for 6 weeks. During the extension, all participants received open-label polmacoxib 2 mg. The primary endpoint was the change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC)-pain subscale score from baseline to week 6. Secondary endpoints included WOMAC-OA Index, OA subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function) and Physician's and Subject's Global Assessments at weeks 3 and 6. Other outcome measures included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and physical examinations. Results After 6 weeks, the polmacoxib-placebo treatment difference was −2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], −4.4 to −0.6; p = 0.011) and the polmacoxib-celecoxib treatment difference was 0.6 (CI, −0.9 to 2.2; p = 0.425). According to Physician's Global Assessments, more subjects were “much improved” at week 3 with polmacoxib than with celecoxib or placebo. Gastrointestinal and general disorder AEs occurred with a greater frequency with polmacoxib or celecoxib than with placebo. Conclusions Polmacoxib 2 mg was relatively well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy superior to placebo and noninferior to celecoxib after 6 weeks of treatment in patients with OA. The results obtained during the 18-week trial extension with polmacoxib 2 mg were consistent with those observed during the 6-week treatment period, indicating that polmacoxib can be considered safe for long-term use based on this relatively small scale of study in a Korean population. More importantly, the results of this study showed that polmacoxib has the potential to be used as a pain relief drug with reduced gastrointestinal side effects compared to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for OA.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Orthopedic Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Han, Seung Beom photo

Han, Seung Beom
Anam Hospital (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE