Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: sphincter of Oddi dysfunction or discordance? What is the state of the art in 2018?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hyun, Jong Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kozarek, Richard A. | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-02T07:03:58Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-10-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-09 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0267-1379 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/3205 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose of reviewTo review important manuscripts published over the previous 2 years relative to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD).Recent findingsThe long-term outcomes of the Evaluating Predictors and Interventions of SOD (EPISOD) trial further substantiated results from the initial EPISOD study, reinforcing that neither endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-manometry nor endoscopic sphincterotomy are appropriate for SOD type III. Pain management in the latter patients has reverted to neuromodulating agents, and recent studies have suggested a role for duloxetine and potentially acupuncture. The functional role of the sphincter of Oddi has been reiterated with a report demonstrating a higher clinically significant pancreatic fistula rate in distal pancreatectomy patients treated with higher doses of postoperative narcotics. Moreover, the injection of periampullary botulinum toxin preoperatively has been shown to decrease these fistulas in a pilot trial. Additional studies have reinforced that eluxadoline can cause sphincter of Oddi spasm and pancreatitis. In contrast to approaching patients with acute relapsing pancreatitis using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and manometry, previous and current studies suggest that endoscopic ultrasound should be done first and the role of SOD in idiopathic acute relapsing pancreatitis remains controversial. Finally, there remain widespread disparities in practice patterns in the approach to patients currently classified as SOD type II.SummaryIn contrast to historical manuscripts which stress the classical definitions of three types of SOD and their consequences, more recent manuscripts on this topic have focused on improving surgical outcomes based on the physiologic role of sphincter of Oddi, as well as the pharmacologic causes and treatments of SOD. The simplistic view that SOD, however it has been diagnosed, requires biliary or dual sphincterotomy is just that, simplistic and potentially misguided. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | - |
dc.subject | IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME | - |
dc.subject | ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY | - |
dc.subject | DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY | - |
dc.subject | SUSPECTED SPHINCTER | - |
dc.subject | PANCREATITIS | - |
dc.subject | EPISOD | - |
dc.subject | CHOLECYSTECTOMY | - |
dc.subject | ELUXADOLINE | - |
dc.subject | THERAPY | - |
dc.subject | RISK | - |
dc.title | Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: sphincter of Oddi dysfunction or discordance? What is the state of the art in 2018? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Hyun, Jong Jin | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000455 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85062419098 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000442244600002 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, v.34, no.5, pp.282 - 287 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 34 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 282 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 287 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Gastroenterology & Hepatology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SUSPECTED SPHINCTER | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PANCREATITIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EPISOD | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CHOLECYSTECTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ELUXADOLINE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | THERAPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RISK | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | endoscopic sphincterotomy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | idiopathic acute relapsing pancreatitis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | sphincter of Oddi dysfunction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | sphincter of Oddi manometry | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (02841) 82-2-2286-1265
COPYRIGHT 2020 KOREA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIBRARY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.