Detailed Information

Cited 9 time in webofscience Cited 7 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Therapeutic Confirmatory Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Avanafil in Korean Patients with Erectile Dysfunctionopen access

Authors
Park, Hyun JunKim, Sae WoongKim, Je JongLee, Sung WonPaick, Jae SeungAhn, Tae YoungPark, KwangsungPark, Jong KwanPark, Nam Cheol
Issue Date
Jun-2017
Publisher
대한의학회
Keywords
Erectile Dysfunction; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Penile Erection
Citation
Journal of Korean Medical Science, v.32, no.6, pp 1016 - 1023
Pages
8
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Volume
32
Number
6
Start Page
1016
End Page
1023
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/34183
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2017.32.6.1016
ISSN
1011-8934
1598-6357
Abstract
A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with 158 subjects who were randomized to placebo or avanafil 50, 100, and 200 mg on demand for 8 weeks to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of avanafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in Korean men. The primary outcome was the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included changes in the scores of IIEF questions 3 and 4 (IIEF Q3, Q4) from baseline, changes in all domain scores in the IIEF from baseline, Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2-5 (SEP2-5), the Global Efficacy Assessment Question (GEAQ), and the number of subjects whose EF domain score at the 8th week visit was >= 26. After 8 weeks of treatment, the dose groups except avanafil 50 mg scored significantly higher on the IIEF-EF domain from baseline than the placebo group. The changes from baseline in the avanafil group in IIEF Q3 (all doses) and Q4 (200 mg alone) were higher than the placebo group. The differences between avanafil and placebo groups were significant in SEP2 (100 and 200 mg) and SEP3-5 (200 mg). The differences in the GEAQ "Yes" response were also significant in the avanafil 100 and 200 mg groups. Regarding the ratio of normal EF at the end of the study, avanafil 200 mg differed significantly from the placebo. Most treatment-associated adverse events were mild and resolved spontaneously.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Urology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Je Jong photo

Kim, Je Jong
Anam Hospital (Department of Urology, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE