Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 15 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Rectal hyposensitivity and functional anorectal outlet obstruction are common entities in patients with functional constipation but are not significantly associated

Authors
Lee T.H.Lee J.S.Hong S.J.Jeon S.R.Kwon S.H.Kim W.J.Kim H.G.Cho W.Y.Cho J.Y.Kim J.-O.Lee J.S.
Issue Date
2013
Publisher
Korean Association of Internal Medicine
Keywords
Functional defecation disorder; Intussusception; Rectal hyposensitivity; Rectocele
Citation
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, v.28, no.1, pp 54 - 61
Pages
8
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume
28
Number
1
Start Page
54
End Page
61
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/34984
DOI
10.3904/kjim.2013.28.1.54
ISSN
1226-3303
2005-6648
Abstract
Background/Aims: The causes of functional anorectal outlet obstruction (outlet obstruction) include functional defecation disorder (FDD), rectocele, and rectal intussusception (RI). It is unclear whether outlet obstruction is associated with rectal hyposensitivity (RH) in patients with functional constipation (FC). The aim of this study was to determine the association between RH and outlet obstruction in patients with FC. Methods: This was a retrospective study using a prospectively collected constipation database, and the population comprised 107 patients with FC (100 females; median age, 49 years). We performed anorectal manometry, defecography, rectal barostat, and at least two tests (balloon expulsion test, electromyography, or colon transit time study). RH was defined as one or more sensory threshold pressures raised beyond the normal range on rectal barostat. We investigated the association between the presence of RH and an outlet obstruction such as large rectocele (> 2 cm in size), RI, or FDD. Results: Forty patients (37.4%) had RH. No significant difference was observed in RH between patients with small and large rectoceles (22 [44.9%] vs. 18 [31%], respectively; p = 0.140). No significant difference was observed in RH between the non-RI and RI groups (36 [36.7%] vs. 4 [30.8%], respectively; p = 0.599). Furthermore, no significant difference in RH was observed between the non-FDD and FDD groups (19 [35.8%] vs. 21 [38.9%], respectively; p = 0.745). Conclusions: RH and outlet obstruction are common entities but appear not to be significantly associated. © 2013 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
1. Basic Science > Department of Preventive Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE