Detailed Information

Cited 49 time in webofscience Cited 66 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Treatment Outcomes for Patients with Failed Back Surgery

Authors
Cho, Jae HwanLee, Jae HyupSong, Kwang SupHong, Jae-YoungJoo, Yoon-SukLee, Dong-HoHwang, Chang JuLee, Choon Sung
Issue Date
Jan-2017
Publisher
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians
Keywords
Failed back surgery syndrome; post spinal surgery syndrome; chronic low back pain; post lumbar surgery syndrome; epidural adhesiolysis; spinal cord stimulation; epidural injection; revision
Citation
Pain Physician, v.20, no.1, pp E29 - E43
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Pain Physician
Volume
20
Number
1
Start Page
E29
End Page
E43
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/5372
ISSN
1533-3159
2150-1149
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a frequently encountered disease entity following lumbar spinal surgery. Although many plausible reasons have been investigated, the exact pathophysiology remains unknown. Various medications, reoperations, interventions such as spinal cord stimulation, epidural adhesiolysis or epidural injection, exercise therapy, and psychotherapy have been suggested treatment options. However, the evidence of the clinical outcome for each treatment has not been clearly determined. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of each treatment modality and to present treatment guidelines for patients with FBSS. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of each treatment regimen in patients with FBSS. METHODS: The available literature regarding each modality for the treatment of refractory back pain or radiating pain for FBSS was reviewed. The quality assessment and the level of evidence were analyzed using the “Methodology Checklist” of SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network). Data sources included relevant English language literature identified through searches of Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from 1980 to Feb 2016. The primary outcome measure was pain relief of back pain or radiating pain for at least 3 months. Secondary outcome measures were improvement of the patient’s functional status, health-related quality of life, return to work, and reduction of opioid use. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles were finally identified and reviewed. Based on our analysis, epidural adhesiolysis showed a short-term (6 to 24 months) effect (grade A) and spinal cord stimulation showed a mid-term (2 or 3 years) effect (grade B). Epidural injections showed a short-term (up to 2 years) effect (grade C). However, other treatments were recommended as grade D or inconclusive. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this systematic review included the rarity of relevant literature. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural adhesiolysis or spinal cord stimulation can be effective in order to control chronic back pain or leg pain due to FBSS, and its recommendation grades are A and B, respectively. Other treatments showed poor or inconclusive evidence.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Orthopedic Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Hong, Jae Young photo

Hong, Jae Young
Ansan Hospital (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ansan Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE