Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Phase III Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan/Amlodipine plus Rosuvastatin Combination Treatment in Patients with Concomitant Hypertension and Dyslipidemia: A LEISURE Study

Authors
Jo, Sang-HoKang, Seok MinYoo, Byung SuLee, Young SooYoun, Ho JoongMin, KyungwanYu, Jae MyungYoon, Hyun JuKim, Woo ShikKim, Gee HeePark, Jae HyoungKim, Seok YeonKim, Cheol Ho
Issue Date
Jan-2022
Publisher
MDPI AG
Keywords
olmesartan; amlodipine; rosuvastatin; single pill combination; phase III clinical trial
Citation
Journal of Clinical Medicine, v.11, no.2
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Volume
11
Number
2
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/55312
DOI
10.3390/jcm11020350
ISSN
2077-0383
2077-0383
Abstract
Background: This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of an olmesartan/amlodipine single pill plus rosuvastatin combination treatment for patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia. Methods: Patients with both hypertension and dyslipidemia aged 20-80 were enrolled from 36 tertiary hospitals in Korea from January 2017 to April 2018. Patients were randomized to three groups in a 1:1:0.5 ratio, olmesartan/amlodipine single pill plus rosuvastatin (olme/amlo/rosu) or olmesartan plus rosuvastatin (olme/rosu) or olmesartan/amlodipine single pill (olme/amlo) combination. The primary endpoints were change of sitting systolic blood pressure (sitSBP) from baseline in the olme/amlo/rosu vs. olme/rosu groups and the percentage change of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline in the olme/amlo/rosu vs. olme/amlo groups after 8 weeks of treatment. Results: A total of 265 patients were randomized, 106 to olme/amlo/rosu, 106 to olme/rosu and 53 to olme/amlo groups. Baseline characteristics among the three groups did not differ. The mean sitSBP change was significantly larger in the olme/amlo/rosu group with -24.30 +/- 12.62 mmHg (from 153.58 +/- 10.90 to 129.28 +/- 13.58) as compared to the olme/rosu group, -9.72 +/- 16.27 mmHg (from 153.71 +/- 11.10 to 144.00 +/- 18.44 mmHg). The difference in change of sitSBP between the two groups was -14.62 +/- 1.98 mmHg with significance (95% CI -18.51 to -10.73, p < 0.0001). The mean LDL-C reduced significantly in the olme/amlo/rosu group, -52.31 +/- 16.63% (from 154.52 +/- 30.84 to 72.72 +/- 26.08 mg/dL) as compared to the olme/amlo group with no change, -2.98 +/- 16.16% (from 160.42 +/- 32.05 to 153.81 +/- 31.57 mg/dL). Significant difference in change was found in LDL-C between the two groups with -50.10 +/- 2.73% (95% CI -55.49 to -44.71, p < 0.0001). Total adverse drug reaction rates were 10.48%, 5.66% and 3.7% in the olme/amlo/rosu, olme/rosu and olme/amlo groups, respectively with no statistical significance among the three groups. Serious adverse drug reactions did not occur. Conclusions: Olmesartan/amlodipine single pill plus rosuvastatin combination treatment for patients with both hypertension and dyslipidemia is effective and safe as compared to either olmesartan plus rosuvastatin or olmesartan plus amlodipine treatment.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Cardiology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Jae Hyoung photo

Park, Jae Hyoung
Anam Hospital (Department of Cardiology, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE