Detailed Information

Cited 7 time in webofscience Cited 9 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Profile of Morning Administration of Controlled-release Simvastatin Versus Evening Administration of Immediate-release Simvastatin in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With Dyslipidemiaopen access

Authors
Yi, Yong JinKim, Hyo JinJo, Sang KyungKim, Sung GyunSong, Young RimChung, WookyungHan, Kum HyunLee, Chang HwaHwang, Young-HwanOh, Kook-Hwan
Issue Date
Aug-2014
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Keywords
chronic kidney disease; controlled-release preparations; drug administration schedule; dyslipidemia; simvastatin
Citation
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, v.36, no.8, pp 1182 - 1190
Pages
9
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
Volume
36
Number
8
Start Page
1182
End Page
1190
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/9092
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.005
ISSN
0149-2918
1879-114X
Abstract
Purpose: Evening administration of the conventional immediate-release (IR) formulation of simvastatin is recommended because of its short half-life (1.9 hours). In a healthy population, morning administration of a controlled-release (CR) formulation of simvastatin was shown to have equivalent lipid-lowering efficacy and a safety profile similar to that of evening doses of IR simvastatin. The present study aimed to verify noninferiority and to compare the safety of morning administration of CR simvastatin with that of evening administration of IR simvastatin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who have dyslipidemia. Methods: The present study was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, Phase IV trial with an active comparator. We randomly assigned 122 patients with CKD and dyslipidemia to 1 of 2 drug administration groups: morning administration of CR simvastatin 20 mg (test group) and evening administration of IR simvastatin 20 mg (control group). After 8 weeks, the treatment outcomes and adverse effects of the 2 treatments were compared. Findings: The mean (SD) percentage of change in serum LDL-C at the end of treatment was -35.1% (15.7%) for the test group and -35.6% (14.6%) for the control group. The difference between the 2 groups was not significant (P = 0.858). The 95% CI of the difference in the percentage of change of LDL-C between the test and control groups was -6.0 to 5.0. There was no difference in the percentage of change of total cholesterol (-24.3% [12.5%] vs -26.5% [12.0%], P = 0.317), triglyceride (-10.6% [35.1%] vs -12.4% [33.2%], P = 0.575) and HDL-C (10.2% [20.7%] vs 4.5% [11.4%], P = 0.064). Treatment-related adverse events were similar in both groups (10 events in the test group vs 8 events in the control group, P = 0.691). Implications: The efficacy of morning administration of CR simvastatin was noninferior to evening administration of IR simvastatin in patients with CKD. Furthermore, the safety profile analysis showed no significant difference between the 2 treatments. Morning administration of CR simvastatin is expected to increase patient compliance and therefore better control of dyslipidemia in CKD patients. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Nephrology and Hypertension > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jo, Sang Kyung photo

Jo, Sang Kyung
Anam Hospital (Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE