Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Seok Kyeong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, Byung Gun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Won, Young Ju | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Dong Kyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Seong Shin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-11T01:40:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-11T01:40:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-8180 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-4529 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/55536 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Study objective Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has gained popularity for perioperative analgesia in various surgeries. However, its efficacy in lumbar surgery remains unclear. This review aimed to determine whether ESPB could improve analgesic efficacy in lumbar spine surgery. Design A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting Perioperative setting. Patients Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia. Interventions We searched the databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science etc. for published eligible controlled trials comparing ESPB with control (no block/sham block) in lumbar spine surgery. Measurements The primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. Main results Twelve studies comprising 665 participants were included. Compared to the control, ESPB reduced the opioid (morphine milligram equivalents) consumption significantly 24 h after surgery [mean difference (MD) = −14.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), −21.03 to −8.07; P < 0.0001] and lowered the pain scores at various time points (at rest or during movement) for 48 h after surgery. ESPB increased the patient satisfaction score (0−10) (MD = 2.38; 95% CI, 2.10 to 2.66; P < 0.0001), decreased the postoperative nausea and vomiting [risk ratio (RR) = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.67; P = 0.001], and minimized the length of hospital stay (MD = −1.24 days; 95% CI, −2.31 to −0.18; P = 0.02). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed additional reduction in opioid consumption by the block approach at the vertebral level of incision/operation than that at the fixed thoracic/lumbar level. However, considerable heterogeneity and low-grade quality of evidence were observed. Conclusions ESPB provided effective postoperative analgesia resulting in better patient satisfaction and recovery with decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lumbar surgery compared to the control. However, the low-grade quality of evidence compromised the findings, therefore further high-quality of evidence is required. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021233362. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | - |
dc.title | Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110647 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85122562971 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000766779200045 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, v.78 | - |
dc.citation.title | Journal of Clinical Anesthesia | - |
dc.citation.volume | 78 | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Anesthesiology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Anesthesiology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANESTHESIA | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Erector spinae plane block | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Neurosurgical procedures | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Lumbar vertebrae | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nerve block | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Opioid analgesics | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (02841)82-2-2286-1265
COPYRIGHT 2020 KOREA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIBRARY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.