Detailed Information

Cited 3 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Surgical strategy for metastatic spinal tumor patients with surgically challenging situationopen access

Authors
Shin, Hong KyungKim, MyeongjongLee, SubumLee, Jung JaePark, DanbiJeon, Sang RyongRoh, Sung WooPark, Jin Hoon
Issue Date
Jul-2022
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.
Keywords
clinical outcome; metastatic spinal tumor; radiological outcome; surgical strategy; surgically challenging situation
Citation
Medicine, v.101, no.27, pp E29560
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Medicine
Volume
101
Number
27
Start Page
E29560
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/61208
DOI
10.1097/MD.0000000000029560
ISSN
0025-7974
1536-5964
Abstract
The incidence of spinal metastasis is increasing as cancer patients live longer owing to the improvement of cancer treatments. However, traditional surgery (TS) which fixates at least 2 levels above and 2 levels below the affected vertebrae is sometimes difficult to perform as it is burdensome to the patients. In this article, we introduce our experience and strategy in treating spinal metastasis, focusing particularly on challenging cases. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 110 patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic spinal tumors from April 2018 to March 2020. Among them, 5 patients who received anterior approach surgery were excluded. The remaining 105 patients were enrolled. In addition to TS, we also performed cervical pedicle screw, cervicothoracic junction fixation, thoracolumbar short fixation, and decompression surgery, depending on the characteristics of the tumor. The overall survival was analyzed, and the local tumor control rate was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Perioperative clinical characteristics including Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire, visual analog scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, and Karnofsky Performance Score were also investigated. The overall survival rate was 57.9% at 1 year, and the local tumor control rate was 81.1% after surgery. There was a statistically significant difference according to the type of the tumor in the survival analysis: the overall survival rates were 72.7% for favorable tumors and 48.6% for unfavorable tumors at 12 months after surgery (P = .04). Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire, visual analog scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, and Karnofsky Performance Score was improved after surgery. All surgical methods, including TS, cervical pedicle screw, cervicothoracic junction fixation, thoracolumbar short fixation, and decompression surgery, showed good clinical and radiological outcomes. Optimized surgical methods show similarly good clinical outcomes in managing spinal metastasis as TS.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Neurosurgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE