Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 2 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Spinal Cord Injury and Postdural Puncture Headache following Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection: A Case Reportopen access

Authors
Park, Hyung JoonKim, HeezooJeong, Sung JinLee, Jae HakChoi, Sang SikLee, Chung Hun
Issue Date
Sep-2022
Publisher
Lietuvos Gydytoju Sajunga
Keywords
spinal cord injury; postdural puncture headache; cervical epidural steroid injection
Citation
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), v.58, no.9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
Volume
58
Number
9
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/61571
DOI
10.3390/medicina58091237
ISSN
1010-660X
1648-9144
Abstract
Background: Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI) is increasingly used as an interventional treatment for pain originating from the cervical spine. However, serious neurological complications may occur during CIESI because of direct nerve damage following inappropriate needle placement. Case report: A 35-year-old woman presented with posterior neck pain radiating to the left upper arm. Cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed left C6 nerve impingement. CIESI under fluoroscopic guidance was performed at another hospital using the left C5/6 interlaminar approach. Immediately after the procedure, the patient experienced dizziness, decreased blood pressure, motor weakness in the left upper arm, and sensory loss. She visited our emergency department with postdural puncture headache (PDPH) that worsened after the procedure. Post-admission cervical MRI revealed intramedullary T2 high signal intensity and cord swelling from the C4/5 to C6/7 levels; thus, a diagnosis of spinal cord injury was made. The patient's PDPH spontaneously improved after 48 h. However, despite conservative treatment with steroids, the decrease in abduction of the left fifth finger and loss of sensation in the dorsum of the left hand persisted for up to 6 months after the procedure. As noticed in the follow-up MRI performed 6 months post-procedure, the T2 high signal intensity in the left intramedullary region had decreased compared to that observed previously; however, cord swelling persisted. Furthermore, left C7/8 radiculopathy with acute denervation was confirmed by electromyography performed 6 months after the procedure. Conclusions: Fluoroscopy does not guarantee the prevention of spinal cord penetration during CIESI. Moreover, persistent neurological deficits may occur, particularly due to intrathecal perforation or drug administration during CIESI. Therefore, in accordance with the recommendations of the Multisociety Pain Workgroup, we recommend performing CIESI at the C6/7 or C7/T1 levels, where the epidural space is relatively large, rather than at the C5/6 level or higher.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Hee Zoo photo

Kim, Hee Zoo
Guro Hospital (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Guro Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE