Detailed Information

Cited 4 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effect of a repeated verbal reminder of orientation on emergence agitation after general anaesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial

Authors
Lee, SeoheeSohn, Jin YoungHwang, In EobLee, Ho-JinYoon, SusieBahk, Jae-HyonKim, Bo Rim
Issue Date
Apr-2023
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Keywords
delirium; emergence agitation; general anaesthesia; recovery from anaesthesia; safety
Citation
British Journal of Anaesthesia, v.130, no.4, pp 439 - 445
Pages
7
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume
130
Number
4
Start Page
439
End Page
445
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/62878
DOI
10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.009
ISSN
0007-0912
1471-6771
Abstract
Background An orientation strategy providing repeated verbal reminders of time, place, and person has been widely used for the non-pharmacological management of delirium. We hypothesised that using this strategy could reduce emergence agitation and improve recovery profiles. Methods This prospective observer-blinded RCT included male and female patients aged 18–70 yr undergoing minimally invasive abdominal surgery. During emergence from general anaesthesia, subjects in the orientation group (n=57) were provided a repeated reminder, including orientation: ‘(Patient's name), you are now recovering from general anaesthesia after surgery at Seoul National University Hospital, open your eyes!’ via noise-cancelling headphones, whereas those in the control group (n=57) only heard their name: ‘(Patient's name), open your eyes!‘. The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation (Riker sedation agitation scale [SAS] ≥5). The incidence of dangerous agitation (SAS=7), maximal SAS score in the operating room, and recovery profile until 24 h postoperatively were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Results The incidence of emergence agitation in the operating room was significantly lower in the orientation group than in the control group (16/57 [28.1%] vs 38/57 [66.7%]; relative risk [95% confidence interval], 0.5 [0.3–0.7]; P<0.001). The incidence of dangerous agitation (0 [0.0%] vs 10 [17.5%], P=0.001) and the median maximal SAS score (4 [4–5] vs 5 [4–6], P<0.001) were also lower in the orientation group. Secondary outcomes, other than agitation-related variables, were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Repeated verbal stimulation of orientation may serve as a simple and easily applicable strategy to reduce emergence agitation after general anaesthesia.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE