Comparison of treatment response and serious infection using tacrolimus, tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil, in comparison to cyclophosphamide as induction treatment for lupus nephritis

초록

Aims. This study evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for lupus nephritis. Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included to investigate the effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus, tacrolimus+MMF, and CYC as a lupus induction therapy. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis of the random effects to incorporate direct and indirect data from RCTs. Results: Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria, giving a sample size of 543 patients. Tacrolimus+MMF had a significantly higher overall response rate (complete plus partial remission) than CYC (OR 4.22, 95% credible interval (Crl) 11.02 - 29.23) and was more efficacious than tacrolimus (OR 2.02, 95% Crl 0.24 - 28.51). Tacrolimus had higher overall response than CYC (OR 2.14, 95% Crl 0.38 - 12.33). Ranking the treatments based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) suggested that tacrolimus+MMF was the best treatment by the overall response (SUCRA = 0.876), followed by tacrolimus (SUCRA = 0.533) and CYC (SUCRA = 0.091). Tacrolimus was the least likely to cause serious infections (SUCRA = 0.758), followed by CYC (SUCRA = 0.398) and tacrolimus+MMF (SUCRA = 0.345). Conclusion: Tacralimus+MMF was the most effective induction treatment for patients with lupus nephritis, and tacrolimus was the least likely to cause severe infections.

키워드