Antibiotics Prophylaxis for Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Skull Base Tumor Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

초록

Background The regimen of prophylactic antibiotic for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EE-SBS) varies considerably depending on surgeons and their institutes. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to assess the effect of antibiotic regimens on EE-SBS surgery for anterior skull base tumor. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trial databases were systematically searched through October 15, 2022. Results The 20 included studies were all retrospective. The studies included a total of 10,735 patients who underwent EE-SBS for skull base tumor. The proportion of patients with postoperative intracranial infection across all 20 studies was 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5%–1.3%). The proportion of postoperative intracranial infection in the multiple antibiotics group did not show statistically significant difference to that of the single antibiotic agent group (proportion: 0.6%, 95% CI 0%–1.4% vs. proportion: 1%, 95% CI 0.6%–1.5%, respectively, P = 0.39). The ultra-short duration maintenance group showed lower incidence of postoperative intracranial infection, although it did not reach statistical significance (ultra-short group: 0.7%, 95% CI 0.5%–0.9%; short duration: 1.8%, 95% CI 0.5%–3%; and long duration: 1%, 95% CI 0.2%–1.9%, P = 0.22) The combination of the multiple antibiotics group did not show meaningful low incidence of postoperative intracranial infection (antibiotics combination group: 0.6%, 95% CI 0%–1.4%; cefazolin single group: 0.8%, 95% CI 0%–1.6%; and single antibiotics other than cefazolin: 1.2%, 95% CI 0.7%–1.7%, P = 0.22). Conclusions Multiple antibiotics did not show superiority compared with single antibiotic agent. Also, long maintenance duration of antibiotics did not reduce the incidence of postoperative intracranial infection.

키워드