Reliability of self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among diagnostic radiologic technologists

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

7
Citations

SCOPUS

7

초록

Background We aimed to assess the reliability of a self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among radiologic technologists. Methods We enrolled 941 participants who had repeatedly completed the questionnaire from the 2012–2013 radiologic technologists’ health study in South Korea. We used percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability of responses on work practices. Results Overall agreement for ever-never diagnostic radiation procedures was high (87.5–97.5%), and κ values indicated substantial agreement (0.66–0.86) in all procedures except cephalometric and intraoral radiography. For the information of year of work start and working duration, high agreement was obtained (ICC: 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). However, use of a worn dosimeter and of personal protective equipment showed only moderate to substantial agreement. Conclusions Self-reported information on working practices regarding radiation exposure in radiologic technologists was reliable enough for epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:377–385, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

키워드

occupational exposure; radiation; radiologic technologists; reproducibility; worker; questionnaire; WORK HISTORIES; BREAST-CANCER; VALIDITY; EXPOSURE; HEALTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; INFORMATION; DESIGN; COHORT; RISKS
제목
Reliability of self-reported questionnaire on occupational radiation practices among diagnostic radiologic technologists
저자
Kim, Moon Jung; Cha, Eun Shil; Ko, Yousun; Chun, Byung Chul; Lee, Won Jin
DOI
10.1002/ajim.22704
발행일
2017-04
유형
Article
저널명
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
권
60
호
4
페이지
377 ~ 385