상세 보기
5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
- Lee, Cheol Hyun;
- Nam, Chang-Wook;
- Cho, Yun-Kyeong;
- Yoon, Hyuck-Jun;
- Kim, Kwon-Bae;
- ... Rha, Seung Woon;
- ... Lim, Do Sun;
- ... Hong, Soon-Jun;
- 외 23명
SCOPUS
21초록
The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB-opening procedure in patients with left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions including LM were selected from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry and divided into the simple crossover-alone group and SB-opening group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization). Among 2,194 patients who underwent the 1-stent strategy, 1,685 (76.8%) patients were treated with simple crossover alone, and 509 (23.2%) patients were treated with an additional SB-opening procedure. Although the baseline SB angiographic disease was more severe in the SB-opening group, the final lumen diameter of the SB was larger. The 5-year observed target lesion failure rate was similar between the 2 groups (7.0% in the simple crossover vs. 6.7% in SB-opening group; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.48; p = 0.947), even in the subgroup analyses including LM (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.442) and true bifurcation (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.362). The results were not changed after an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. There was no difference in the overall and SB-related target lesion revascularization rate in both groups. The long-term clinical outcome of the 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions was acceptable compared to those of additional SB-opening procedures. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494). © 2021 The Authors.
키워드
- 제목
- 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
- 저자
- Lee, Cheol Hyun; Nam, Chang-Wook; Cho, Yun-Kyeong; Yoon, Hyuck-Jun; Kim, Kwon-Bae; Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol; Kim, Hyo-Soo; Chun, Woo Jung; Han, Seung Hwan; Rha, Seung Woon; Chae, In-Ho; Jeong, Jin-Ok; Heo, Jung Ho; Yoon, Junghan; Lim, Do Sun; Park, Jong-Seon; Hong, Myeong-Ki; Lee, Sung Yun; Cha, Kwang Soo; Kim, Doo-Il; Bae, Jang-Whan; Chang, Kiyuk; Hwang, Byung-Hee; Choi, So-Yeon; Jeong, Myung Ho; Choi, Ki Hong; Song, Young Bin; Hong, Soon-Jun; Doh, Joon-Hyung; Koo, Bon-Kwon; Hur, Seung-Ho
- 발행일
- 2021-06
- 유형
- Journal Article
- 저널명
- JACC: Asia
- 권
- 1
- 호
- 1
- 페이지
- 53 ~ 64
- 언어
- ENG
- 출판사
- Elsevier
- 발행국가
- 미국
- 분량
- 12 페이지
- ISSN
- P 2772-3747