Sorafenib with or without concurrent transarterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The phase III STAH trial

  • Park, Joong-Won; 
  • Kim, Yoon Jun; 
  • Kim, Do Young; 
  • Bae, Si-Hyun; 
  • Paik, Seung Woon; 
  • ... Yeon, Jong Eun; 
  • 외 8명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

173
Citations

SCOPUS

185

초록

Background & Aims Sorafenib is first-line standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet it confers limited survival benefit. Therefore, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes of sorafenib combined with concurrent conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) vs. sorafenib alone in patients with advanced HCC. Methods In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase III trial, patients were randomized to receive sorafenib alone (Arm S, n = 169) or in combination with cTACE on demand (Arm C, n = 170). Sorafenib was started within 3 days and cTACE within 7–21 days of randomization. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results For Arms C and S, the median OS was 12.8 vs. 10.8 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91; 90% CI 0.69–1.21; p = 0.290); median time to progression, 5.3 vs. 3.5 months (HR 0.67; 90% CI 0.53–0.85; p = 0.003); median progression-free survival, 5.2 vs. 3.6 months (HR 0.73; 90% CI 0.59–0.91; p = 0.01); and tumor response rate, 60.6% vs. 47.3% (p = 0.005). For Arms C and S, serious (grade ≥3) adverse events occurred in 33.3% vs. 19.8% (p = 0.006) of patients and included increased alanine aminotransferase levels (20.3% vs. 3.6%), hyperbilirubinemia (11.8% vs. 3.0%), ascites (11.8% vs. 4.2%), thrombocytopenia (7.2% vs. 1.2%), anorexia (7.2% vs. 1.2%), and hand-foot skin reaction (10.5% vs. 11.4%). A post hoc subgroup analysis compared OS in Arm C patients (46.4%) receiving ≥2 cTACE sessions to Arm S patients (18.6 vs. 10.8 months; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40–0.82; p = 0.006). Conclusion Compared with sorafenib alone, sorafenib combined with cTACE did not improve OS in patients with advanced HCC. However, sorafenib combined with cTACE significantly improved time to progression, progression-free survival, and tumor response rate. Sorafenib alone remains the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced HCC. Lay summary For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma requiring sorafenib therapy, co-administration with conventional transarterial chemoembolization did not improve overall survival compared to sorafenib alone. Therefore, sorafenib alone remains the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical Trial Number: NCT01829035.

키워드

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Sorafenib; Transarterial chemoembolization; Combination treatment; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; LIVER-CANCER; PORTAL-VEIN; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; EFFICACY
제목
Sorafenib with or without concurrent transarterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The phase III STAH trial
저자
Park, Joong-Won; Kim, Yoon Jun; Kim, Do Young; Bae, Si-Hyun; Paik, Seung Woon; Lee, Youn-Jae; Kim, Hwi Young; Lee, Han Chu; Han, Sang Young; Cheong, Jae Youn; Kwon, Oh Sang; Yeon, Jong Eun; Kim, Bo Hyun; Hwang, Jaeseok
DOI
10.1016/j.jhep.2018.11.029
발행일
2019-04
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Hepatology
권
70
호
4
페이지
684 ~ 691