Detailed Information

Cited 34 time in webofscience Cited 45 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Cognitive Stimulation as a Therapeutic Modality for Dementia: A Meta-Analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kayoung-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Ji Won-
dc.contributor.authorSo, Yoonseop-
dc.contributor.authorSee, Jiyeong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, You Joung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Joon Hyuk-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seok Bum-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jung Jae-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Hyun-Ghang-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Hui-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ki Woong-
dc.date.available2020-11-02T08:29:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-
dc.identifier.issn1738-3684-
dc.identifier.issn1976-3026-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/4714-
dc.description.abstractObjective Although cognitive stimulation (CS) is one of the most popular non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia, its efficacy is still debatable. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of CS in people with dementia. Methods Data sources were identified by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, psychINFO, and Cochrane Reviews Library. A total of 7,354 articles were identified, and of these, 30 RCTs were selected based on the selection criteria. Of these 30 RCTs, 14 were finally included in our meta-analysis [731 participants with dementia; 412 received CS (CS group) and 319 received usual care (control group)]. Results We found that the people with dementia had a moderate benefit from CS. The mean difference between the CS and control groups was 2.21 [95% CI (0.93, 3.49), Z=3.38, p=0.00007] in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition and 1.41 [95% CI (0.98, 1.84), Z=6.39, p<0.00001] in the Mini-Mental State Examination. CS also improved quality of life in people with dementia [95% CI (0.72, 3.38), Z=3.02, p=0.003]. Conclusion CS is effective for improving cognition and quality of life in people with dementia; however, its effects were small to moderate.-
dc.format.extent14-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherKOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOC-
dc.titleCognitive Stimulation as a Therapeutic Modality for Dementia: A Meta-Analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.626-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85029772050-
dc.identifier.wosid000410870800014-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, v.14, no.5, pp 626 - 639-
dc.citation.titlePSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage626-
dc.citation.endPage639-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART002261658-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPsychiatry-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPsychiatry-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREALITY ORIENTATION THERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALZHEIMERS-DISEASE PATIENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDWELLING OLDER PERSONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-OF-LIFE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusELDERLY-PATIENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHOLINESTERASE-INHIBITORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPEOPLE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTERVENTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCALE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCognitive stimulation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDementia-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMeta-analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCognition-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorQuality of life-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Psychiatry > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jeong, Hyun Ghang photo

Jeong, Hyun Ghang
Guro Hospital (Department of Psychiatry, Guro Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE