Detailed Information

Cited 14 time in webofscience Cited 18 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Venlafaxine versus mirtazapine in the treatment of undifferentiated somatoform disorder - A 12-week prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial

Authors
Han, ChangsuPae, Chi-UnLee, Bun-HeeKo, Young-HoonMasand, Prakash S.Patkar, Ashwin A.Joe, Sook-HaengJung, In-Kwa
Issue Date
2008
Publisher
ADIS INT LTD
Keywords
Mirtazapine, therapeutic use; Somatoform disorders; Venlafaxine, therapeutic use
Citation
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, v.28, no.4, pp 251 - 261
Pages
11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
Volume
28
Number
4
Start Page
251
End Page
261
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/17534
DOI
10.2165/00044011-200828040-00006
ISSN
1173-2563
1179-1918
Abstract
Objective: We set out to compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus venlafaxine in patients with undifferentiated somatoform disorder (USD) using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15). Methods: This was a 12-week prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial. The trial consisted of six visits that included baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12. The primary effectiveness measure was the mean change in PHQ-15 total score from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary effectiveness measures included the mean changes in total scores on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) from baseline to the end of treatment. Ninety-five subjects were randomized to either mirtazapine (n =50) or venlafaxine (n = 45); 71 subjects completed the study (mirtazapine: n=39/50 [78%]; venlafaxine: n = 32/45 [71%]). Results: The mean total score on the PHQ-15 decreased by 34.7% (-8.4, p < 0.0001) from baseline to endpoint in the mirtazapine group and by 26.6% (-6.1, p < 0.0001) in the venlafaxine group. A marginally significant between-group difference was observed for the mean change in total score on the PHQ-15 from baseline to endpoint (F = 4.126, p = 0.046). The mean total scores on the GHQ-12 and BDI from baseline to endpoint decreased by -4.9 (29.4%, p < 0.0001) and -13.5 (55.9%, p < 0.0001), respectively, in the mirtazapine group, and by -4.3 (26.2%, p = 0.001) and -9.02 (46.0%, p < 0.0001), respectively, in the venlataxine group. No between-group difference was observed for the mean changes in total scores on the secondary effectiveness measures from baseline to endpoint. Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that both mirtazapine and venlafaxine may be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with USD. Double-blind, placebo-controlled and/or head-to-head comparison studies are required to allow definite conclusions to be drawn.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Psychiatry > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Han, Changsu photo

Han, Changsu
Ansan Hospital (Department of Psychiatry, Ansan Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE