Detailed Information

Cited 90 time in webofscience Cited 101 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial

Authors
Chang, Hyuk-JaeLin, Fay Y.Gebow, DanAn, Hae YoungAndreini, DanieleBathina, RaviBaggiano, AndreaBeltrama, VirginiaCerci, RodrigoChoi, Eui-YoungChoi, Jung-HyunChoi, So-YeonChung, NamsikCole, JasonDoh, Joon-HyungHa, Sang-JinHer, Ae-YoungKepka, CezaryKim, Jang-YoungKim, Jin-WonKim, Sang-WookKim, WoongPontone, GianlucaValeti, UmaVillines, Todd C.Lu, YaoKumar, AmitCho, IksungDanad, IbrahimHan, DongheeHeo, RanLee, Sang-EunLee, Ji HyunPark, Hyung-BokSung, Ji-minLeflang, DavidZullo, JosephShaw, Leslee J.Min, James K.
Issue Date
Jul-2019
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Keywords
coronary computed tomographic angiography; invasive coronary angiography; major adverse cardiac events; stable ischemic heart disease
Citation
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, v.12, no.7, pp 1303 - 1312
Pages
10
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume
12
Number
7
Start Page
1303
End Page
1312
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/1853
DOI
10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018
ISSN
1936-878X
1876-7591
Abstract
Objectives This study compared the safety and diagnostic yield of a selective referral strategy using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) compared with a direct referral strategy using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the index procedure. Background Among patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD), a sizeable proportion who are referred to ICA do not have a significant, obstructive stenosis. Methods In a multinational, randomized clinical trial of patients referred to ICA for nonemergent indications, a selective referral strategy was compared with a direct referral strategy. The primary endpoint was noninferiority with a multiplicative margin of 1.33 of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (blindly adjudicated death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, urgent and/or emergent coronary revascularization or cardiac hospitalization) at a median follow-up of 1-year. Results At 22 sites, 823 subjects were randomized to a selective referral and 808 to a direct referral strategy. At 1 year, selective referral met the noninferiority margin of 1.33 (p = 0.026) with a similar event rate between the randomized arms of the trial (4.6% vs. 4.6%; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.47). Following CCTA, only 23% of the selective referral arm went on to ICA, which was a rate lower than that of the direct referral strategy. Coronary revascularization occurred less often in the selective referral group compared with the direct referral to ICA (13% vs. 18%; p < 0.001). Rates of normal ICA were 24.6% in the selective referral arm compared with 61.1% in the direct referral arm of the trial (p < 0.001). Conclusions In stable patients with suspected CAD who are eligible for ICA, the comparable 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events rates following a selective referral and direct referral strategy suggests that both diagnostic approaches are similarly effective. In the selective referral strategy, the reduced use of ICA was associated with a greater diagnostic yield, which supported the usefulness of CCTA as an efficient and accurate method to guide decisions of ICA performance. (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization [CONSERVE]; NCT01810198)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Cardiology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jin Won photo

Kim, Jin Won
Guro Hospital (Department of Cardiology, Guro Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE