Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: According to the vessel anastomosis sites
- Authors
- Park S.Y.; Kim D.H.; Joe H.B.; Yoo J.Y.; Kim J.S.; Kang M.; Hong Y.W.
- Issue Date
- 2012
- Publisher
- Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
- Keywords
- Cardiac output; Cardiovascular; Measurement techniques; OPCAB
- Citation
- Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, v.62, no.5, pp 423 - 428
- Pages
- 6
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
- Volume
- 62
- Number
- 5
- Start Page
- 423
- End Page
- 428
- URI
- https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/30835
- DOI
- 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.5.423
- ISSN
- 2005-6419
2005-7563
- Abstract
- Background: During beating heart surgery, the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques may be influenced by several factors. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical agreement among stat CO mode (SCO), continuous CO mode (CCO), arterial pressure waveform-based CO estimation (APCO), and transesophageal Doppler ultrasound technique (UCCO) according to the vessel anastomosis sites. Methods: This study was prospectively performed in 25 patients who would be undergoing elective OPCAB. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at the following time points: during left anterior descending (LAD) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min; during obtuse marginal (OM) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min: and during right coronary artery (RCA) anastomosis at 1 min and 5 min. The variables measured including the SCO, CCO, APCO, and UCCO. Results: CO measurement techniques showed different correlations according to vessel anastomosis site. However, the percent error observed was higher than the value of 30% postulated by the criteria of Critchley and Critchley during all study periods for all CO measurement techniques. Conclusions: In the beating heart procedure, SCO, CCO and APCO showed different correlations according to the vessel anastomosis sites and did not agree with UCCO. CO values from the various measurement techniques should be interpreted with caution during OPCAB. © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2012.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 2. Clinical Science > Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.