Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Appropriate doses of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in high-risk subgroups with atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysisopen access

Authors
Kim, In-SooKim, Hyun-JungKim, Tae-HoonUhm, Jae-SunJoung, BoyoungLee, Moon-HyoungPak, Hui-Nam
Issue Date
Sep-2018
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Keywords
Atrial fibrillation; Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; Oral anticoagulant-nayve; Previous stroke; Meta-analysis
Citation
JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, v.72, no.3-4, pp 284 - 291
Pages
8
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume
72
Number
3-4
Start Page
284
End Page
291
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/3184
DOI
10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.03.009
ISSN
0914-5087
1876-4738
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the dose-dependent efficacy, safety, and all-cause mortality of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in "atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were OAC-naive," or "AF patients with prior-stroke history" with those who were known to be high-risk subgroups under OAC. Methods: After a systematic database search (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), five phase-III randomized trials comparing NOACs and warfarin in "OAC-naive/OAC-experienced," or "with/without prior-stroke history" subgroups were included. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model to determine the relative risk (RR) for stroke/systemic thromboembolism (SSTE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality. Results: 1. In OAC-naive patients, standard-dose NOACs showed superior efficacy and safety with lower mortality [RR 0.90 (0.84-0.97), p = 0.008, I-2 = 0%] compared to warfarin. 2. For OAC-experienced patients, low-dose NOACs showed equivalent efficacy but reduced risk of major bleeding [RR 0.61 (0.40-0.91), p = 0.02, I-2 = 89%], and had lower all-cause mortality [RR 0.86 (0.75-0.99), p = 0.04, I-2 = 38%] compared to warfarin. 3. For patients with prior-stroke history, low-dose NOACs showed equivalent efficacy, but reduced risk of major bleeding [RR 0.58 (0.48-0.70), p < 0.001, I-2 = 0%] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.76 (0.66-0.88), p < 0.001, I-2 = 0%] compared to warfarin. 4. Among patients without prior-stroke history, standard-dose NOAC was superior to warfarin for both SSTE prevention [RR 0.78 (0.66-0.91), p = 0.002, I-2= 43%] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.91 (0.850.97), p = 0.004, I-2 = 0%]. Conclusions: In conclusion, standard-dose NOAC showed lower all-cause mortality than warfarin in OACnaive patients with AF, and low-dose NOAC was better than warfarin among the patients with prior stroke history in terms of all-cause mortality. (C) 2018 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
3. Graduate School > Graduate School > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE