Detailed Information

Cited 10 time in webofscience Cited 10 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Understanding of Terminal Cancer and Its Relationship with Attitudes toward End-of-Life Care Issues

Authors
Lee, June KooYun, Young HoAn, Ah ReumHeo, Dae SeogPark, Byeong-WooCho, Chi-HeumKim, SungLee, Dae HoLee, Soon NamLee, Eun SookKang, Jung HunKim, Si-YoungLee, Jung LimLee, Chang GeolLim, Yeun KeunKim, SamyongChoi, Jong SooJeong, Hyun SikChun, Mison
Issue Date
Aug-2014
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Keywords
terminal cancer; end of life; terminology; life-sustaining treatment; palliative care
Citation
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, v.34, no.6, pp 720 - 730
Pages
11
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Volume
34
Number
6
Start Page
720
End Page
730
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/34724
DOI
10.1177/0272989X13501883
ISSN
0272-989X
1552-681X
Abstract
Background. Although terminal cancer is a widely used term, its meaning varies, which may lead to different attitudes toward end-of-life issues. The study was conducted to investigate differences in the understanding of terminal cancer and determine the relationship between this understanding and attitudes toward end-of-life issues. Methods. A questionnaire survey was performed between 2008 and 2009. A total of 1242 cancer patients, 1289 family caregivers, 303 oncologists from 17 hospitals, and 1006 participants from the general population responded. Results. A 6-month life expectancy was the most common understanding of terminal cancer (45.6%), followed by treatment refractoriness (21.1%), metastatic/recurrent disease (19.4%), survival of a few days/weeks (11.4%), and locally advanced disease (2.5%). The combined proportion of treatment refractoriness and 6-month life expectancy differed significantly between oncologists and the other groups combined (76.0% v. 65.9%, P = 0.0003). Multivariate analyses showed that patients and caregivers who understood terminal cancer as survival of a few days/weeks showed more negative attitudes toward disclosure of terminal status compared with participants who chose treatment refractoriness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.79 for patients; aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.63 for caregivers). Caregivers who understood terminal cancer as locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent disease showed a significantly lower percentage of agreement with withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment compared with those who chose treatment refractoriness (aOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.54 for locally advanced; aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.72 for metastatic/recurrent). Conclusions. The understanding of terminal cancer varied among the 4 participant groups. It was associated with different preferences regarding end-of-life issues. Standardization of these terms is needed to better understand end-of-life care.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE