Detailed Information

Cited 43 time in webofscience Cited 46 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Dosing of Udenafil in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Authors
Zhao, ChenKim, Sae WoongYang, Dae YulKim, Je JongPark, Nam CheolLee, Sung WonPaick, Jae SeungAhn, Tai YoungMin, Kweon SikPark, KwangsungPark, Jong Kwan
Issue Date
Aug-2011
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Keywords
Udenafil; Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5-I); Erectile dysfunction (ED); Clinical study; Once-daily dosing
Citation
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, v.60, no.2, pp 380 - 387
Pages
8
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume
60
Number
2
Start Page
380
End Page
387
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/35194
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.025
ISSN
0302-2838
1421-993X
Abstract
Background: A once-daily dosing regimen with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor is needed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), in part because of the behavioral complexities associated with sexual intimacy. Many patients prefer spontaneous rather than scheduled sexual activities or they anticipate frequent sexual encounters. The pharmacokinetic profiles of udenafil with a time of maximal concentration of 1.0-1.5 h and a terminal half-life of 11-13 h make udenafil a good candidate for once-daily dosing. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing of udenafil in the treatment of ED. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, fix-dosed clinical trial involved 237 patients with ED. The subjects, who were treated with placebo or udenafil (25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg) once daily for 12 wk, were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary, and the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) during the study. Measurements: The primary outcome parameter was the change from baseline for the IIEF erectile function domain (EFD) score. The secondary outcome parameters were SEP questions 2 and 3, the shift to normal rate (EFD >= 26), and the response to the GAQ. Results and limitations: Compared with placebo, patients who took 50 mg or 75 mg of udenafil had a significantly improved IIEF-EFD score. Similar results were observed in comparing questions 2 and 3 in the SEP diary and the GAQ. Flushing was the most common treatment-related adverse event, which was transient and mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions: Udenafil significantly improved erectile function among ED patients when administered in doses of 50 mg or 75 mg once daily for 12 wk. Daily administration of udenafil (50 mg) may be another treatment option for ED. (C) 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Urology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Je Jong photo

Kim, Je Jong
Anam Hospital (Department of Urology, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE