Detailed Information

Cited 60 time in webofscience Cited 66 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The efficacy and safety of udenafil, a new selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with erectile dysfunction

Authors
Paick, Jae-SeungKim, Sae WoongYang, Dae YeolKim, Ja JongLee, Sung WonAhn, Tai YoungChoi, Hyung KiSuh, Jun-KyuKim, Sae Chul
Issue Date
Apr-2008
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Keywords
Erectile Dysfunction; PDE5; Udenafil; Clinical Trial
Citation
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, v.5, no.4, pp 946 - 953
Pages
8
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE
Volume
5
Number
4
Start Page
946
End Page
953
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/35734
DOI
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00723.x
ISSN
1743-6095
1743-6109
Abstract
Introduction. Udenafil is a potent selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor newly developed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Aim. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of udenafil therapy in patients with ED. Methods. In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group phase III trial, 167 patients with ED of diverse origin and severity were randomized to take placebo or udenafil at fixed doses of 100 or 200 mg as needed for 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measures. Primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in erectile function (EF) domain scores of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) questionnaire. Secondary efficacy variables include change from baseline in scores on the IIEF Questions 3 and 4 (IIEF Q3 and Q4), change from baseline in all domain scores of the IIEF, patients' responses to questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP2 and SEP3), and patients' responses to the Global Assessment Question (GAQ). Any adverse events were also recorded during the trial. Results. After 12 weeks of treatment, the patients treated with udenafil showed significantly greater change from baseline in the IIEF-EF domain score compared with placebo (placebo, 0.20; 100-mg udenafil, 7.52; and 200-mg udenafil, 9.93, respectively) (P < 0.0001). Compared with placebo, udenafil significantly enhanced the rates of successful penetration (SEP Q2) and maintenance of erection (SEP Q3) (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, significantly greater proportions of udenafil treatment groups responded positively to the GAQ compared with the placebo group (GAQ: placebo, 25.9%; 100-mg udenafil, 81.5%; and 200-mg udenafil, 88.5%, respectively) (P < 0.0001). Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild to moderate with facial flushing and headache being the most common. Conclusions. Udenafil is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for ED of broad-spectrum etiology and severity. Paick J-S, Kim SW, Yang DY, Kim JJ, Lee SW, Ahn TY, Choi HK, Suh J-K, and Kim SC. The efficacy and safety of udenafil, a new selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2008;5:946-953.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Urology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Je Jong photo

Kim, Je Jong
Anam Hospital (Department of Urology, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE