Detailed Information

Cited 3 time in webofscience Cited 3 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Predictors of Newborn's Weight for Height: A Machine Learning Study Using Nationwide Multicenter Ultrasound Data

Authors
Ahn, Ki HoonLee, Kwang-SigLee, Se JinKwon, Sung OkNa, SunghunKim, KyongjinKang, Hye SimLee, Kyung A.Won, Hye-SungKim, Moon YoungHwang, Han SungPark, Mi Hye
Issue Date
Jul-2021
Publisher
MDPI
Keywords
newborn; weight; height; estimated fetal weight; abdominal circumference
Citation
DIAGNOSTICS, v.11, no.7
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
DIAGNOSTICS
Volume
11
Number
7
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/54080
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics11071280
ISSN
2075-4418
2075-4418
Abstract
There has been no machine learning study with a rich collection of clinical, sonographic markers to compare the performance measures for a variety of newborns' weight-for-height indicators. This study compared the performance measures for a variety of newborns' weight-for-height indicators based on machine learning, ultrasonographic data and maternal/delivery information. The source of data for this study was a multi-center retrospective study with 2949 mother-newborn pairs. The mean-squared-error-over-variance measures of five machine learning approaches were compared for newborn's weight, newborn's weight/height, newborn's weight/height(2) and newborn's weight/hieght(3). Random forest variable importance, the influence of a variable over average node impurity, was used to identify major predictors of these newborns' weight-for-height indicators among ultrasonographic data and maternal/delivery information. Regarding ultrasonographic fetal biometry, newborn's weight, newborn's weight/height and newborn's weight/height(2) were better indicators with smaller mean-squared-error-over-variance measures than newborn's weight/height(3). Based on random forest variable importance, the top six predictors of newborn's weight were the same as those of newborn's weight/height and those of newborn's weight/height(2): gestational age at delivery time, the first estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference in week 36 or later, maternal weight and body mass index at delivery time, and the first biparietal diameter in week 36 or later. These six predictors also ranked within the top seven for large-for-gestational-age and the top eight for small-for-gestational-age. In conclusion, newborn's weight, newborn's weight/height and newborn's weight/height(2) are more suitable for ultrasonographic fetal biometry with smaller mean-squared-error-over-variance measures than newborn's weight/height(3). Machine learning with ultrasonographic data would be an effective noninvasive approach for predicting newborn's weight, weight/height and weight/height(2).
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
4. Research institute > Institute of Human Behavior and Genetics > 1. Journal Articles
2. Clinical Science > Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Kwang Sig photo

Lee, Kwang Sig
Research Institute (Institute of Human Behavior and Genetics)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE