Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Immediate-Release Versus SLOW-Release Carvedilol in Heart Failure Patient (SLOW-HF): a Prospective Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study

Authors
Park, Chan SoonPark, Jin JooLee, Hae-YoungKang, Seok-MinYoo, Byung-SuJeon, Eun-SeokHong, Suk KeunShin, Joon-HanKim, Myung-APark, Dae-GyunKim, Eung-juHong, Soon-junKim, Seok YeonKim, Jae-JoongChoi, Dong-Ju
Issue Date
Jun-2023
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Keywords
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; Carvedilol; Slow release; Clinical efficacy; NT-proBNP
Citation
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, v.37, no.3, pp 529 - 537
Pages
9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Volume
37
Number
3
Start Page
529
End Page
537
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/55307
DOI
10.1007/s10557-021-07238-3
ISSN
0920-3206
1573-7241
Abstract
Purpose Carvedilol demonstrated therapeutic benefits in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, it had a short half-life time mandating twice a day administration. We investigated whether slow-release carvedilol (carvedilol-SR) is non-inferior to standard immediate-release carvedilol (carvedilol-IR) in terms of clinical efficacy in patients with HFrEF. Methods We randomly assigned patients with HFrEF to receive carvedilol-SR once a day or carvedilol-IR twice a day. The primary endpoint was the change in N-terminal pro B-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level from baseline to 6 months after randomization. The secondary outcomes were proportion of patients with NT-proBNP increment > 10% from baseline, mortality rate, readmission rate, changes in blood pressure, quality of life, and drug compliance. Results A total of 272 patients were randomized and treated (median follow-up time, 173 days). In each group of patients taking carvedilol-SR and those taking carvedilol-IR, clinical characteristics were well balanced. No patient died during follow-up, and there was no significant difference in the change of NT-proBNP level between two groups (-107.4 [-440.2–70.3] pg/mL vs. -91.2 [-504.1–37.4] pg/mL, p = 0.101). Change of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, control rate and response rate of blood pressure, readmission rate, and drug compliance rate were also similar. For safety outcomes, the occurrence of adverse reactions did not differ between carvedilol-SR group and carvedilol-IR group. Conclusion Carvedilol-SR once a day was non-inferior to carvedilol-IR twice a day in patients with HFrEF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03209180 (registration date: July 6, 2017)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Cardiology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Eung Ju photo

Kim, Eung Ju
Guro Hospital (Department of Cardiology, Guro Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE