Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The mortality analysis of primary prevention patients receiving a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) according to guideline indications in the improve SCA study

Authors
Ching, Chi KeongHsieh, Yu-ChengLiu, Yen-BingRodriguez, Diego A.Kim, Young-HoonJoung, BoyoungSingh, BalbirHuang, DejiaHussin, AzlanChasnoits, Alexandr R.O'Brien, Janet E.Cerkvenik, JeffreyLexcen, DanielVan Dorn, BrianZhang, Shu
Issue Date
Aug-2021
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Keywords
cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator; guideline adherence; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; mortality; primary prevention; sudden cardiac death
Citation
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, v.32, no.8, pp 2285 - 2294
Pages
10
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume
32
Number
8
Start Page
2285
End Page
2294
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/55330
DOI
10.1111/jce.15149
ISSN
1045-3873
1540-8167
Abstract
Background In primary prevention (PP) patients the utilization of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-D) remains low in many geographies, despite the proven mortality benefit. Purpose The objective of this analysis was to examine the mortality benefit in PP patients by guideline-indicated device type: ICD and CRT-D. Methods Improve sudden cardiac arrest was a prospective, nonrandomized, nonblinded multicenter trial that enrolled patients from regions where ICD utilization is low. PP patient's CRT-D or ICD eligibility was based upon the 2008 ACC/AHA/HRS and 2006 ESC guidelines. Mortality was assessed according to guideline-indicated device type comparing implanted and nonimplanted patients. Cox proportional hazards methods were used, adjusting for known factors affecting mortality risk. Results Among 2618 PP patients followed for a mean of 20.8 ± 10.8 months, 1073 were indicated for a CRT-D, and 1545 were indicated for an ICD. PP CRT-D-indicated patients who received CRT-D therapy had a 58% risk reduction in mortality compared with those without implant (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.61, p < .0001). PP patients with an ICD indication had a 43% risk reduction in mortality with an ICD implant compared with no implant (adjusted HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41–0.81, p = .002). Conclusions This analysis confirms the mortality benefit of adherence to guideline-indicated implantable defibrillation therapy for PP patients in geographies where ICD therapy was underutilized. These results affirm that medical practice should follow clinical guidelines when choosing therapy for PP patients who meet the respective defibrillator device implant indication.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Cardiology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Young Hoon photo

Kim, Young Hoon
Anam Hospital (Department of Cardiology, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE