Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 46 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsopen access

Authors
Song J.H.Jeong J.U.Lee J.H.Kim S.H.Cho H.M.Um J.W.Jang H.S.Korean Clinical Practice Guideline for Colon and Rectal Cancer Committee
Issue Date
2017
Publisher
Department of Radiation Oncology
Keywords
Chemoradiotherapy; Postoperative; Preoperative; Rectal cancer; Surgery
Citation
Radiation Oncology Journal, v.35, no.3, pp 198 - 207
Pages
10
Indexed
SCOPUS
ESCI
KCI
Journal Title
Radiation Oncology Journal
Volume
35
Number
3
Start Page
198
End Page
207
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/5631
DOI
10.3857/roj.2017.00059
ISSN
2234-1900
2234-3156
Abstract
Purpose: Whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is better than postoperative CRT in oncologic outcome and toxicity is contentious in prospective randomized clinical trials. We systematically analyze and compare the treatment result, toxicity, and sphincter preservation rate between preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT in stage II–III rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1990 to 2014 for relevant trials. Only phase III randomized studies performing CRT and curative surgery were selected and the data were extracted. Meta-analysis was used to pool oncologic outcome and toxicity data across studies. Results: Three randomized phase III trials were finally identified. The meta-analysis results showed significantly lower 5-year locoregional recurrence rate in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.84; p = 0.004). The 5-year distant recurrence rate (p = 0.55), relapse-free survival (p = 0.14), and overall survival (p = 0.22) showed no significant difference between two groups. Acute toxicity was significantly lower in the preoperative- CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in perioperative and chronic complications (p = 0.53). The sphincter-saving rate was not significantly different between two groups (p = 0.24). The conversion rate from abdominoperineal resection to low anterior resection in low rectal cancer was significantly higher in the preoperative-CRT group than in the postoperative-CRT group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: As compared to postoperative CRT, preoperative CRT improves only locoregional control, not distant control and survival, with similar chronic toxicity and sphincter preservation rate in rectal cancer patients. © 2017. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Um, Jun Won photo

Um, Jun Won
Ansan Hospital (Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ansan Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE