Detailed Information

Cited 127 time in webofscience Cited 148 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Health and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: systematic review

Authors
Oh, ByeongsangLee, Kyung JuZaslawski, ChrisYeung, AlbertRosenthal, DavidLarkey, LindaBack, Michael
Issue Date
Dec-2016
Publisher
Japanese Society for Hygiene
Keywords
Nature; Forest; Health; Wellbeing; Green environment
Citation
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, v.22, no.1
Indexed
SCIE
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Volume
22
Number
1
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/5713
DOI
10.1186/s12199-017-0677-9
ISSN
1342-078X
1347-4715
Abstract
Background Numerous studies have reported that spending time in nature is associated with the improvement of various health outcomes and well-being. This review evaluated the physical and psychological benefits of a specific type of exposure to nature, forest therapy. Method A literature search was carried out using MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and ProQuest databases and manual searches from inception up to December 2016. Key words: “Forest” or “Shinrin -Yoku” or “Forest bath” AND “Health” or “Wellbeing”. The methodological quality of each randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool. Results Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Participants’ ages ranged from 20 to 79 years. Sample size ranged from 18 to 99. Populations studied varied from young healthy university students to elderly people with chronic disease. Studies reported the positive impact of forest therapy on hypertension (n = 2), cardiac and pulmonary function (n = 1), immune function (n = 2), inflammation (n = 3), oxidative stress (n = 1), stress (n = 1), stress hormone (n = 1), anxiety (n = 1), depression (n = 2), and emotional response (n = 3). The quality of all studies included in this review had a high ROB. Conclusion Forest therapy may play an important role in health promotion and disease prevention. However, the lack of high-quality studies limits the strength of results, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish clinical practice guidelines for its use. More robust RCTs are warranted.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE