Detailed Information

Cited 14 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Quality of life discordance between terminal cancer patients and family caregivers: a multicenter study

Authors
Lee, Yong JooKim, Jung EunChoi, Youn SeonHwang, In CheolHwang, Sun WookKim, Young SungKim, Hyo MinAhn, Hong YupKim, So Jin
Issue Date
Jul-2016
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Discordance; Emotional distress; Family caregiver; Quality of life; Terminal cancer
Citation
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, v.24, no.7, pp 2853 - 2860
Pages
8
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
Volume
24
Number
7
Start Page
2853
End Page
2860
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/6262
DOI
10.1007/s00520-016-3108-3
ISSN
0941-4355
1433-7339
Abstract
Background Research studies on quality of life (QOL) discordance between cancer patients and family caregivers are limited, and the results are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine QOL discordance between patients and family caregivers in a hospice setting and to identify factors associated with the discordance. Methods We enrolled 178 patient-family caregiver pairs from six tertiary hospital hospice palliative care units in South Korea in this cross-sectional study. To establish groupings based on patient and family caregiver QOL levels, we measured the QOL of patient and family caregiver pairs using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 for Palliative Care and the Caregiver QOL Index-Cancer, respectively. Pairs were categorized into the following three groups: both good QOL pairs, only poor patient QOL, and only poor family caregiver QOL. Factors associated with only poor patient or only poor family caregiver QOL were compared to both good QOL pairs. A stepwise multivariate regression model was used to identify relevant factors. Results The QOL of family caregivers did not correlate significantly (P=0.227) with QOL in terminally ill cancer patients. As well, poor emotional function in patients was the only significant factor associated with the only poor patient QOL group [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.1; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.5-11.5]. However, emotionally distressed family caregivers (aOR, 10.2; 95 % CI, 2.8-37.5), family caregiverswho professed a religion (aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-11.3), and family caregivers with low social support (aOR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5-10.6) were independent predictors for the only poor family caregiver QOL group. Conclusions Assessing the respective emotional status of both the patient and family caregiver is needed in hospice care to reduce the gap in QOL between the two groups. Further, more attention should be paid to the lack of social support for family caregivers.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Family Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Choi, Youn Seon photo

Choi, Youn Seon
Guro Hospital (Department of Family Medicine, Guro Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE