Detailed Information

Cited 3 time in webofscience Cited 3 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparative Outcomes of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Using Midline Incision or Low Transverse Incision for Hand-assisted Port Placement

Authors
Gwon, Jun GyoJun, HeungmanKim, Myung GyuBoo, Yoon JungJung, Cheol Woong
Issue Date
Jun-2016
Publisher
BASKENT UNIV
Keywords
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery; Donor nephrectomy; Kidney transplant
Citation
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, v.14, no.3, pp 282 - 286
Pages
5
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume
14
Number
3
Start Page
282
End Page
286
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2020.sw.kumedicine/6407
DOI
10.6002/ect.2015.0220
ISSN
1304-0855
2146-8427
Abstract
Objectives: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is performed in many centers for donor nephrectomy. A midline incision for hand-assisted port placement is generally used but produces an unsightly scar. In this study, patients who had hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with low transverse incision were compared with those who received a midline incision. Materials and Methods: Our study group included patients who received hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy from February 2012 to December 2014 at Korea University Anam Hospital. We retrospectively compared outcomes of these patients based on midline incision (45 patients) versus low transverse incision (17 patients). Risk factors, including age, sex, body mass index, creatinine level, glomerular filtration rate of allograft, side of graft kidney, number of renal arteries, duration of surgical procedure, and warm ischemic time, were compared between the midline and low transverse incision groups. Results: When we compared the midline versus low transverse incision groups, duration of surgical procedure (P = .043), postoperative day 3 glomerular filtration rate (P = .017), and postoperative day 3 pain score (P = .049) were significantly higher in the low transverse incision group versus the midline incision group. Postoperative day 3 results for duration of hospitalization (P = .030) and pain score (P = .021) were also significantly higher in the low transverse versus midline incision groups when we focused on patients with left nephrectomy. Conclusions: Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with low transverse incision is more painful and necessitates a longer hospital stay and longer surgical procedure. Despite these disadvantages, hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with low transverse incision can offer a better cosmetic outcome with no definitive differences regarding renal function compared with a midline incision. Surgeons should consider these aspects when deciding on the best method for donor nephrectomy.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Transplantation and Vascular Surgery > 1. Journal Articles
2. Clinical Science > Department of Pediatric Surgery > 1. Journal Articles
2. Clinical Science > Department of Nephrology and Hypertension > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Jung, Cheol Woong photo

Jung, Cheol Woong
Anam Hospital (Department of Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE