Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol

Authors
Park, Sang-MinSong, Kwang-SupKim, Ho-JoongPark, Si-YoungKang, TaewookKang, Min-SeokHeo, Dong HwaPark, Choon KeunLee, Dong-GeunHwang, Jin SubJang, Jae-WonKim, Jun YoungKim, Jin-SungLee, Hong-JaeYou, Ki-HanPark, Hyun-Jin
Issue Date
22-Feb-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Lumbar disc herniation; Biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy; Microscopic lumbar discectomy; Randomized controlled trial
Citation
Trials, v.23, no.1
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Trials
Volume
23
Number
1
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/55415
DOI
10.1186/s13063-022-06094-2
ISSN
1745-6215
1745-6215
Abstract
Background Biportal endoscopic surgery has recently been performed in lumbar discectomy, with advantages over conventional surgery, such as less skin scarring and muscle damage. However, the clinical results have not been established. Although previous studies reported no difference between the biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy clinical results, the evidence was weak. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biportal endoscopic discectomy versus the microscopic discectomy. Methods This prospective multicenter randomized controlled equivalence trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar discectomy using biportal endoscopy or microscopy. We will include 100 participants (50 per group) with a lumbar herniated disc. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 12 months after surgery based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy. The secondary outcomes will include the visual analog scale score for low back and lower extremity radiating pain, the ODI score, the Euro-Qol-5-Dimensions score, surgery satisfaction, walking time, postoperative return to daily life period, postoperative surgical scar, and surgery-related variables, such as postoperative drainage, operation time, admission duration, postoperative creatine kinase, and implementation status of conversion to open surgery. Radiographic outcomes will also be analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) and simple radiographs. Safety will be assessed by evaluating all adverse and severe adverse events and surgery-related effects. The participants will be assessed by a blinded assessor before surgery (baseline) and 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Discussion This trial will be the first prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to analyze the efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic discectomy in lumbar herniated disc. This trial is designed for evaluating the equivalence of the results between biportal endoscopic and microscopic discectomy including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and prospective registration to reduce bias. This trial will provide enough data on the effectiveness and safety of biportal endoscopic surgery and will be an important study that allows clear conclusions. Trial registration Clinical Research Information Service (cris.nih.go.kr.) (KCT0006191). Registered on 27 March 2021
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Orthopedic Surgery > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE