Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of Heart and Lung Doses According to Tumor Bed Boost Techniques in Early-Stage Left-Sided Breast Cancer: Simultaneous Integrated Boost versus Sequential Boostopen access

Authors
Kim, MyungsooLee, Nam KwonLee, SukHwang, Jinho
Issue Date
Jul-2022
Publisher
Lietuvos Gydytoju Sajunga
Keywords
breast cancer; radiotherapy; volumetric modulated arc therapy; simultaneous integrated boost
Citation
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), v.58, no.7
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
Volume
58
Number
7
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/61309
DOI
10.3390/medicina58070873
ISSN
1010-660X
1648-9144
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The boost dose to the tumor bed after whole breast irradiation (WBI) can be divided into sequential boost (SEQ) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). SIB using modern radiation therapy (RT) techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy, allow the delivery of a highly conformal dose to the target volume and has a salient ability to spare at-risk organs. This study aimed to compare the radiation dose delivered to the heart and lungs according to boost technique and tumor bed location. Materials and Methods: RT planning data of 20 patients with early-stage left-sided breast cancer were used in this study. All patients were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy after breast-conserving surgery with a sentinel lymph node biopsy. For each patient, two different plans, whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost (WBI-SIB) and sequential boost after WBI (WBI-SEQ), were generated. To compare the dose received by each organ at risk (OAR), dose-volume histogram data were analyzed. The mean dose (D-mean) and volume of each organ that received x Gy (Vx) were calculated and compared. Results: For the heart, the V10 was lower for the WBI-SIB plan than for the WBI-SEQ plan (5.223 +/- 1.947% vs. 6.409 +/- 2.545%, p = 0.008). For the left lung, the V5 was lower in the WBI-SIB plan than for the WBI-SEQ plan (27.385 +/- 3.871% vs. 32.092 +/- 3.545%, p < 0.001). The D-mean for the heart and left lung was lower for the WBI-SIB plan than for the WBI-SEQ plan (heart: 339.745 +/- 46.889 cGy vs. 413.030 +/- 52.456 cGy, p < 0.001; left lung: 550.445 +/- 65.094 cGy vs. 602.270 +/- 55.775 cGy, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The WBI-SIB plan delivered lower radiation doses to the heart and left lung than the WBI-SEQ plan in terms of D-mean and low-dose volume in hypofractionated RT of early-stage left-sided breast cancer patients. Furthermore, a large radiation dose per day may be advantageous, considering the radiobiologic aspects of breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data are needed to determine whether the dosimetric advantages of the WBI-SIB plan can lead to clinically improved patient outcomes and reduced late side effects.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Radiation Oncology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Suk photo

Lee, Suk
Anam Hospital (Department of Radiation Oncology, Anam Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE