Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Prasugrel dose de-escalation in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS trial

Authors
Lee, Kyu-SunPark, Keun-HoPark, Kyung WooRha, Seung-WoonHwang, DoyeonKang, JeehoonHan, Jung-KyuYang, Han-MoKang, Hyun-JaeKoo, Bon-KwonLee, Nam-hoRhew, Jay YoungChun, Kook JinLim, Young-HyoBong, Jung MinBae, Jang-WhanLee, Bong KiKim, Seok-YeonShin, Won-YongLim, Hong-SeokPark, KyungilKim, Hyo-SooHOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS
Issue Date
Apr-2023
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Keywords
Acute coronary syndrome; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Prasugrel; De-escalation; Diabetes mellitus
Citation
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, v.9, no.3, pp 262 - 270
Pages
9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume
9
Number
3
Start Page
262
End Page
270
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/62774
DOI
10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad008
ISSN
2055-6837
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM)–acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results This was a post-hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases—Comparison of Reduction of Prasugrel Dose or Polymer Technology in ACS Patients) randomized trial. The efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy (prasugrel 5 mg daily) were compared with conventional therapy (prasugrel 10 mg daily) in patients with DM. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), clinically driven revascularization, stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) class ≥2 bleeding events. The secondary ischaemic outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, ST, or ischaemic stroke. Of 2338 patients randomized, 990 had DM. The primary endpoint of NACE occurred in 38 patients (7.6%) receiving prasugrel dose de-escalation and in 53 patients (11.3%) receiving conventional therapy among patients with DM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43–0.99; P = 0.049]. Prasugrel dose de-escalation as compared with conventional therapy did not increase the risk of ischaemic events (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56–1.88; P = 0.927) but decreased BARC class ≥2 bleeding in patients with DM (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23–0.84; P = 0.012). Conclusion Prasugrel dose de-escalation compared with conventional therapy may reduce the risk of net clinical outcomes, mostly driven by a reduction in bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients with DM. Trial Registration: HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS, NCT02193971, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02193971
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Cardiology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Rha, Seung Woon photo

Rha, Seung Woon
Guro Hospital (Department of Cardiology, Guro Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE