Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Shared decision-making intervention regarding dialysis modality in patients with CKD stage 5open access

Authors
Lee, Young-KiKim, Yang-HyeonKim, Do-HyoungKim, Jin-HeogLee, Jeong-HwanPark, Ji HyeonKo, Gang-JeeHwang, Won-MinGil, Hyo-WookKang, Young-SunJin, Kyu-BokDo, Jun-YoungKim, Se-JoongKim, Beom-SeokShin, Ho Sik
Issue Date
May-2023
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.
Keywords
patient-centered care; peritoneal dialysis; prognosis; quality of life; shared decision-making
Citation
Medicine, v.102, no.19
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Medicine
Volume
102
Number
19
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/63219
DOI
10.1097/MD.0000000000033695
ISSN
0025-7974
1536-5964
Abstract
Background Patients with kidney failure must make complicated decisions about the dialysis modalities used either at home or in-hospital. Different options have varying levels of impact on patients’ physical and psychological conditions and their social life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of an intervention designed to achieve shared decision making (SDM) in patients’ options for dialysis. Methods SDM was performed after consent was written for stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients before dialysis, and 435 cases were performed in 408 patients from December 16, 2019 to June 30, 2021. Among these, 101 patients were compared by SDM measurement scale, patient satisfaction, disease recognition scale survey, and dialysis method. Results The average age of participants was 56 years, with a gender composition of 55 males (54.5%) and 46 females (45.5%). Following SDM, the final dialysis methods decided upon by patients and clinicians were peritoneal dialysis (67 patients, 66.3%), hemodialysis (22 patients, 21.8%), and kidney transplantation (1 patient, 1.0%). Conclusions Among participating patients, SDM was effective when used to decide on dialysis treatment, and patients were satisfied with the dialysis method decision process. On the disease awareness scale, those who participated in this project had relatively high positive and low negative perceptions, so it can be concluded that SDM was relatively effective. The implementation of SDM was helpful in selecting patients’ best dialysis methods, and SDM scale results were higher in the peritoneal dialysis group than in the hemodialysis group.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
2. Clinical Science > Department of Nephrology and Hypertension > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Ko, Gang Jee photo

Ko, Gang Jee
Guro Hospital (Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Guro Hospital)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE