Detailed Information

Cited 4 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Prediction of functional results of percutaneous coronary interventions with virtual stenting and quantitative flow ratio

Authors
Lee, Hyun-JongMejia-Renteria, HernanEscaned, JavierDoh, Joon-HyungLee, Joo MyungHwang, DoyeonYuasa, SonokaChoi, Ki HongJang, Ho-JunJeon, Ki-HyunLee, JuneyoungNam, Chang-WookShin, Eun-SeokKoo, Bon-Kwon
Issue Date
Nov-2022
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Keywords
coronary angiography; coronary physiology; coronary stents; fractional flow reserve; PCI optimization; PCI outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; quantitative flow ratio
Citation
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, v.100, no.7, pp 1208 - 1217
Pages
10
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume
100
Number
7
Start Page
1208
End Page
1217
URI
https://scholarworks.korea.ac.kr/kumedicine/handle/2021.sw.kumedicine/61816
DOI
10.1002/ccd.30451
ISSN
1522-1946
1522-726X
Abstract
Background The clinical value of residual quantitative flow ratio (rQFR), a novel function of QFR technique, is unknown. Aim We investigated the clinical value of rQFR, aimed to predict residual ischemia after virtual percutaneous coronary intervention (vPCI). Methods This is a substudy of the COE-PERSPECTIVE registry, which investigated the prognostic value of post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR). From pre-PCI angiograms, QFR and rQFR were analyzed and their diagnostic performance was assessed at blinded fashion using pre-PCI FFR and post-PCI FFR as reference, respectively. The prognostic value of rQFR after vPCI was assessed according to vessel-oriented composite outcome (VOCO) at 2 years. Results We analyzed 274 patients (274 vessels) with FFR-based ischemic causing lesions (49%) from 555 screened patients. Pre-PCI QFR and FFR were 0.63 ± 0.10 and 0.66 ± 0.11 (R = 0.756, p < 0.001). rQFR after vPCI and FFR after real PCI were 0.93 ± 0.06 and 0.86 ± 0.07 (R = 0.528, p < 0.001). The mean difference between rQFR and post-PCI FFR was 0.068 (95% limit of agreement: −0.05 to 0.19). Diagnostic performance of rQFR to predict residual ischemia after PCI was good (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.856 [0.804−0.909], p < 0.001). rQFR predicted well the incidence of 2-year VOCO after index PCI (AUC: 0.712 [0.555−0.869], p = 0.041), being similar to that of actual post-PCI FFR (AUC: 0.691 [0.512−0.870], p = 0.061). rQFR ≤0.89 was associated with increased risk of 2-year VOCO (hazard ratio [HR]: 12.9 [2.32−71.3], p = 0.0035). This difference was mainly driven by a higher rate of target vessel revascularization (HR: 16.98 [2.33−123.29], p = 0.0051). Conclusions rQFR estimated from pre-PCI angiography and virtual coronary stenting mildly overestimated functional benefit of PCI. However, it well predicted suboptimal functional result and long-term vessel-related clinical events. Clinical Trial Registration Influence of fractional flow reserve on the Clinical OutcomEs of PERcutaneouS Coronary Intervention (COE-PESPECTIVE) Registry, NCT01873560
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
1. Basic Science > Department of Biostatistics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Juneyoung photo

Lee, Juneyoung
College of Medicine (Department of Biostatistics)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE